Pakistan plays hardball: Petraeus vs. Mullen: Split in Afghan exit strategy

Published on Rupee News

Newsweek says that “Pakistan is playing hardball”. Bruce Riedel an influential White House staffer describes the difficulties in the US-Pakistani relationship. He is not alone. US Think Tanks are in overdrive trying to figure out a way out of Afghanistan without losing face. That has become an impossibility.
Jane Parlez has written a profound and important article in the New York Times, on U.S.-Pakistani Relations. She describes in great detail the intra-US rift and sheds light on the fallout with Pakistan on how to exit Pakistan. Jane also describes the substantial rift over US Drone Strikes on Pakistani soil. Both sides are trying to secure their national interests while jockeying with the different players in the region. General Kayani got an extension on the promise that Islamabad would be able to secure a position on the negotiating table–a commitment given to him by none other than Mrs. Hillary Clinton. The US needs a fall-guy for its defeat in the Hindu Kush. The graveyard of empires has defined the limits of a Superpower. Washington knows it needs Pakistan, no matter how frustrating and irritating the relationship is.
A couple of years after Islamabad announced that it had become a Nuclear power, it got embroiled in the Afghan quagmire. It didn’t get a chance to grow into the spot. It has now been a decade, and Pakistan has now become assertive.
The Pakistani Army has grown increasingly restive and angry with US intelligence network over the past couple of years. Now the fifth largest Nuclear power, a resurgent Islamabad is growing more and more resistant to outside pressure and intimidation. Delhi too has learned the simple truth that it can’t intimidate a nuclear rival. Delhi has been forced to resume discussions and dialogue with Pakistan. Today the US is facing some of the pugnacious Pakistani resilience. Unlike Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iraq, or Libya, the U.S. cannot even think about using blatant  force to pressure Pakistan, a fact of which the Pakistanis are well aware of.  All the US can do it send scores of mercenaries into Pakistan to try to intimidate it. However JSOC operations can go only so far–and the ISI is now wise to US tactics and is countering them in a potent manner. Islamabad has a knife on the  NATO jugular–it controls the main US supply line from Karachi to Kabul in Afghanistan.
According to press reports President Obama has refused to halt the drone strikes and has refused to wind down the CIA operations in Pakistan. The WSJ demands a new ultimatum to Pakistan. Gen. Pasha after being turned down in Langley, went straight to Turkey to brief President Zardari who is on an official visit there about his talks.  Analysts have reinforced the conjecture that the release of “Raymond Davis” was tied to a halt in the drones–however there have been two strikes since his release, one killed 45 innocent pro-Pakistani tribal leaders dealing with a domestic issue. Either the CIA reneged, or it defeated the State Department. Apparently the CIA won the argument and wants to continue the strikes. Either way, it has angered the civilian and military troika in Pakistan.
Sources in Pakistan confirm the that difference between the US and Pakistan can be encapsulated in the following few bullets:
  1. The Pakistanis want the CIA infrastructure dismantled in Pakistan and a halt to drone strikes.
  2. In a post-US Kabul, Islamabad wants a smaller Afghan National Army of about 100,000 instead of 400,000 that the US wants.
  3. The US wants a highly centralized Afghan government while Pakistan wants a lose confederation.
  4. Rawalpindi wants reconciliation with the “Good Taliban” while  the US wants to hammer the “Bad Taliban”.
  5. The situation is complicated by the differences between the hawkish General Petraeus‘ political ambitions and Admiral Mullen’s pragmatic approach of including the Pakistanis in the final Afghan settlement.
The Pakistanis are working with the Afghans directly, diffusing the tension and helping them understand that a smaller ANR would be to their own benefit. Islamabad and Kabul seem to be working together to counter what Pakistan has described as a new “Great Game” in Afghanistan. Political analysts describe it as U.S. intentions to establish permanent bases on Afghan soil to be used for launching attacks against Iran and other countries.
There has been a lack of trust between Washington and Islamabad mainly because of the way the US forced Pakistan to participate in the war, and twisted its arm to act against its own interests. The US took advantage of the chaos that reigned during the power transition from Musharraf to Zardari. Langley grew the CIA network and dramatically increased drone bombings, fully knowing that this would destabilize the situation in Pakistan.
Bruce Riedel and gang are still trying to force an India-Pakistani rapprochement ostensibly to use it against China. No one in Islamabad is ready for that kind of suicide pact with Delhi. Kashmir has to be resolved to Pakistan’s satisfaction, and Delhi is not ready to play ball.
According to press reports this disastrous “War on Terror” has cost Pakistan more then $ 75 billion and US has merely compensated less then $ 10 billion over the past decade. The Pakistanis want to halt the US supply lines–and really don’t care about US aid anymore.
It is apparent that the ephemeral strategic alliance made by President George W. Bush and Gen. Pervez Musharraf is as dead as a door nail. The Pakistani official quoted by Ms. Parlez is a poignant reminder of the reality of US-Pakistani relationship “The feeling of being allies was never there,” … “I’ve said to the Americans: ‘You are going to fail in Afghanistan and you are going to make us the fall guy.’ I still think this is going to happen.”
Advertisements
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • Intellectus Motiva  On April 19, 2011 at 9:40 am

    I think it should be clear to all who know history that one of the aspects of a master slave relationship, at least in the west, is hatred by the master to the slave. When the slave successfully wins his freedom, ostensibly through force, the former master sets up obstacles that prevent the slave from furthering the goal of achieving legitimate rights, every so often there is bloodletting of the former slaves ala lynching in the south. It is high time that Pakistani people and Pakistani government accept the fact that America HATES Pakistan. This might seem like harsh words, but the evidence of the Raymond Davis case should be the proof. CIA had Raymond Davis as its station chief, and he was behind most of the terror attacks either directly or indirectly in Pakistan. When he was exposed, the full force of US diplomacy and possible force was used against Pakistan, and the slaves that are occupying the President and Prime Minister’s house were dancing to the master’s tune. Result? The master lied to the slave, and that is okay because the master can take liberties with the slave, and the slave is hated by his master.

    The reality is that Pakistan, for its very own survival needs to stop being the house nigger, and make stronger alliances with other Muslim nations. But with people like Zardari in power he will make roadblocks and other leaders will have to act on their own despite what the niggers in office try to do.

  • Kashif Imran  On April 19, 2011 at 2:18 pm

    Very good!

  • Nasim Hassan  On April 19, 2011 at 4:16 pm

    Slowly but surely the US will do the right thing. They now know that Afghanistan cannot be transformed into a subservient state in less than another fifty years and trillion of dollar in cost.

    Someone has to ask all of these Think Tanks to do a Cost/Benefit analysis of military occupation. They continue to fool American people about the danger of fighting these people in the USA. Common people in the USA have very little knowledge of Geopolitical situation of AfPak region. So they believe whatever US government or mass media tell them.

    Eventually it will be the cost of this war that will decide the outcome.

    Nasim Hassan

    • Arif Khan  On April 20, 2011 at 11:29 am

      Maray Piaray Nasim THe sooner we get the hell out of thee the better??? and move the Marines on our Southern border with Mexico Arif

      • Nasim Hassan  On April 21, 2011 at 12:53 am

        Arif:

        It is very difficult for Americans to understand why a young man would sacrifice his life when his parents are killed in drone attack. They simply cannot comprehend strong ties of relationships.

        In the USA the relationships are tenuous. Here the parents can be homeless while their sons and daughters are living in big houses in other states. I have an American friend who has not seen his daughters for the past twenty years.

        All of their Think Tank scholars, military strategists have a superficial knowledge of AfPak region. So the US continues spending money to drag Afghanistan towards 21st century.

        Nasim

  • Qazi Obaid  On April 19, 2011 at 4:17 pm

    I believe USA know what they are doing and what is the cost v/s benifit.. debating on an issue or commenting with such an authenticity meaning the information was leak by CIA

  • Mian Saleem  On April 20, 2011 at 12:21 am

    Post US pull out what will be the situation in Pakistan. The pundits must address the issue.

  • Bajwa  On April 20, 2011 at 12:46 am

    This is a pretty standard situation in the “buskashi”. You cannot have smooth relations in allies of unequal sizes, interests etc.

    MAB

  • GRK  On April 20, 2011 at 12:47 am

    How much we can offer ourselve for getting screwed time and again.they always forget once we have been used.please read mr f.aijaz uddin book on nixon.yahya.kissinger deliberation on the first secret visit of kissinger to china thanks to late gen yahya ,agha hilaly,sultan saheb and few other magnificent efforts.sadly we always find our selves in firing squad.regards grk

  • Admiral Sirohey  On April 20, 2011 at 6:45 am

    If we remain firm in ensuring our interest there shall be option open to any to deny us our right. It requires unanimity amongst all institutions in harmony with the call of the nation.

    IAS

  • zubair  On April 20, 2011 at 3:06 pm

    It is time our Govt forget that it is a US appointed one and start thinking nationalistic. By promising the moon to their masters, they have on power but it is time to start thing about Pakistan specially when they are busy tryng to win next elections. They must realize that the Americans cannot hurt Pakistan provided our rulers stay steadfast and think of Pakistan only and not their bank balances abroad. There is a limit to what the Pakistanis will tolerate and sooner start than later they will wake up and seriously hold he rulers accountable———-THAT will be a bad day for the US appointees.

  • cybermagnetik  On May 16, 2011 at 2:22 pm

    What a great web log. I spend hours on the net reading blogs, about tons of various subjects. I have to first of all give praise to whoever created your theme and second of all to you for writing what i can only describe as an fabulous article. I honestly believe there is a skill to writing articles that only very few posses and honestly you got it. The combining of demonstrative and upper-class content is by all odds super rare with the astronomic amount of blogs on the cyberspace.

Trackbacks

  • By Eric S Brown Garage on August 20, 2011 at 9:27 am

    Related……

    […]just beneath, are numerous totally not related sites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over[…]……

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: