“Pak-US Relations At a Critical Point” – Hillary Clinton

This is a Pakpotpourri Exclusive

By:General Mirza Aslam Beg  

Former Chief of Army Staff

Threat to our national security increased with the occupation of Afghanistan in 2001, and has reached dangerous proportions now, as the defeated forces are seeking the support of “a compliant regime and a military dictator in Pakistan, to provide the fall back position in Pakistan and a guarantee for safe exit from Afghanistan.” In the past it was easy to bring about the Regime Change, with the help of the Army, the judiciary and political parties but the mood is different now.

      The deceitful action in Abbottabad and the terrorist raid on Mehran Naval Base, were meant to create condition for Regime Change, but conversely these actions invited very strong reactions from the people, the media, the parliament and the armed forces, which caused deep concern in Washington. Clinton and Mullen, came rushing to Pakistan to mend the damage caused to Pak-US strategic relationship. The critical issue is not the US-Pak relationship, but the targeting of the Pakistani Armed Forces, to malign them, through a well orchestrated media campaign, and to break their unity. A very dangerous move indeed, as Anatol Lieven, the author of the book “Pakistan: A Hard Country” warns: “How American folly could destroy Pakistan, by inducing mutiny in the Pakistan Army. Washington, grotesquely might contribute to the destruction of the state it is trying to save and a historic triumph for extremism. Pakistan’s tragedy would then become one of the entire world.”


      The United States and their allies are in a desperate situation in Afghanistan, and need an early exit, which only Taliban can grant, under the condition that the ‘occupation forces must give a definite time-frame for withdrawal.’ It is not 1989, when Mujahideen provided safe exit to the Soviets. The Afghan Taliban now have no trust in Pakistan, or the Americans, who cheated them in 1990 at Geneva and again in 2002 at Bonn, on the matter of power-sharing and the efforts continue even now to keep them out of power. Therefore ‘no safe exit’ and ‘no soft-state’ in Pakistan. So where do the American proceed from here? and what are the choices for Pakistan?

    • Pakistan had enough of war on terror, and stands badly bruised and battered, fighting our own people. Pakistan has to find peace with the tribals. Approach them with open arms and an open mind. Do not repeat the deceitful act of killing Maulvi Nek Mohammad, after truce was reached. Go back to the historic 1947 decision of Quaid-e-Azam and hand over the responsibility of defense of our borders to them.
    • Find peace with the oppressed and the angry Baloch, and pre-empt the dangerous designs of our enemies, to foment revolt and cessation. The on-going process of pacification must be accelerated to achieve national integration.
    • Offer regrets and apology to the Afghans, for joining the American war in 2001, and create space for diplomacy to re-establish friendly relations and facilitate a safe-exit for the occupation forces.
    • Let the election process, throw-up new leadership and the democratic system finds its roots. Any attempt to rock the boat now, would be highly dangerous.
    • Let the supremacy of the law of the land prevail and punishment metted-out to those who break the law.
    • Tell the world that our nuclear assets are safe, as much as safety demands. They are well dispersed and known only to those “who need to know.” Even the users – the Army, Navy and Airforce do not know, where they are kept, but at the time of need, they will be delivered the war-heads, to be embedded with the delivery systems. Our command and control system is one of the best in the world, if not the best. By the Grace of God, ours is the only nuclear programme, in the world, which has never experienced a disaster or a mishap.


      The ‘safety’ of nuclear assets as well as ‘deterrence’ are complementary. One relates to its credibility and the physical ability to keep them safe and the other relates to: “the will to use the capability to deter and defeat aggression”. The will to use this capability is ‘a function of command decision, of the person in authority’ as demonstrated in 1990, when CIA, Mossad and RAW had planned to attack our nuclear assets. We received very disturbing signals from own sources and friends in the Middle East. The then Prime Minister, Benazir Bhutto – “the person in authority”, called an urgent meeting of the Nuclear Command Authority, and after due deliberations took following decisions:

    • Sent the foreign minister to Delhi, with the message, that if attacked, Pakistan would retaliate against India, no matter, where the attack came from.

(I.A. Gujral, the former Prime Minister of India, mentions in his book “Matters of Discretion” about our Foreign Minister’s visit on 23 January 1990 and the message delivered, but cleverly relates it to the tension on the cease-fire line, whereas, our army had put the Indians on the defensive there. Ask former GOC 12 Division, Major General Safdar, SJ, to know the facts. Later-on, when Benazir Bhutto visited India, Gujral asked her, whether, she had sent Sahibzada Sahib with the message. She replied, ‘No’. That was politics.)

    • A squadron of F-16 fully armed with nuclear weapons was ordered to be ready to strike targets deep in the South, at Trombay. These activities were soon picked-up by the American satellites and Robert Gates came rushing to Pakistan to pacify our leaders. President Ghulam Ishaq Khan cooled him down, and never again the Nexus, attempted to challenge Pakistan.


      It is “the man, behind the gun that matters” – Benazir Bhutto was “the person in authority” behind our nuclear capability and had the courage to take such a bold decision to deter aggression. (I hope our man, Zardari is listening). Then, we had only the F-16s and now we have the submarines, missiles and guns, which can deliver conventional as well as nuclear war heads of one KT to twenty KT yield, upto a range of 30 KMs to 3000 KMs. And this capability is all in all, India specific.

      On the night of 1/2 May attack in Abbottabad, two of our F-16s scrambled, but chose not to challenge the American aircrafts providing air cover from across the borders. Rightly so. Our superiority is on ground – the men and missiles and the conventional weapons support. Our men belong to one of the best fighting machine of the world, and the hard core freedom fighters come from our border region and remain undefeated. Based on Men and Missile, we do have a ‘war plan’ to deter and defeat aggression. Let there be no ambiguity about it.

      Whether Osama was killed in 2009 or 2011, is immaterial. Sure, he is dead, for whom, the Americans invaded Afghanistan. It is no more necessary therefore to “jointly chase the shadows.” Turn the page, and negotiate peace with the Afghans, who are fighting for their freedom for the last thirty years and have suffered over two and a half million dead and colossal destruction. Guarantee for safe exit and lasting peace is possible only if the invaders and the aggressors such as, Russia, America, European Union, India and Pakistan, agree to pay the War Damages and find a place in the hearts of the Afghans, through massive reconstruction and rehabilitation works. That is the stark reality, to determine the correct level of Pak-Afghan-US relationship, particularly now when the US war machine is stuck in the hard-rocky sands of Afghanistan. Admiral Patreaus did cry- out after experiencing this hardness: “The reality about Afghanistan is, it is all hard, at all times.”

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • shahbaz  On June 4, 2011 at 6:04 am

    Nice article by gen beg;but he is the one,who is responsible for 99 take over by gen musharaff,as he is the one who protected and saved from many difficult situations. Pakistan will have to buy time and space to survive.This can best be done by improving relations with our real enemy INDIA.Other wise US and INDIA will install a govt in Afghanistan,taliban or no taliban,who will be supported to undo pakistan by increasing their activities in khi,baluchistan and punjab.

  • Abrar  On June 4, 2011 at 7:26 am

    dear all, please do not waste you time in such matters. After seeing so much corruption and indifference to the motherland i have come to a conclusion that perhaps a foreign master would be better than our own corrupt leadership.

    Best Regards,

    M. Abrar Sheikh

  • Arif Khan  On June 4, 2011 at 7:27 am

    First of all I would like to ask Mirza Aslam Beg where he got all his wealth and Houses and lands and money in foreign accounts ??? The CIA has all the details before he becomes a “Holier than thou” person..They are all Corrupt and have made money on Nuclear help from Iran , libya and God knows who? “Sooo Chua kha key Billy Hajj ko chale” Arif Khan

    • Ijaz Khan  On June 4, 2011 at 7:35 am

      Dear Arif
      You are obviously based in US of A judging by the contents of your mail. Before attacking anyone, we must do our homework. Had you done so, you would have known Aslam Beg was born in a Muslim family of Azamgarh village ” Muslim Patti. His father Mirza Murtaza Beg was the then renouned Adovocate and practised in Azamgarh Civil court.A VERY rich man,owing to his practice. I hope you will have the honor to post an apology for your allegation.

  • A Malik  On June 4, 2011 at 7:27 am

    U should not dwell unecessary in the past of ur ex- Chief of Pongos. That can be discussed later. As of now he is talking sense. This is the most pragmatic way around

  • Portugheis Alberto  On June 4, 2011 at 7:35 am

    If you removed the corruptors (foreign “powers”) you wouldn’t have so many corrupted people. Corruptors pay cash, usually into foreign secret accounts, pay luxurious holidays, pay with sex (sending the best prostitutes), etc, etc.

  • Portugheis Alberto  On June 4, 2011 at 7:37 am

    I like the title of the article !!!!! it proves Hillary Clinton is doing the job she’s paid to do: “create and keep US-Pakistan realations at Critical Point”. She does well for USA business!!!!

    • Intellectus Motiva  On June 5, 2011 at 7:00 am

      Alberto is her job to keep messing around or is her job to foster good relationships with other countries and the US. If she is supposed to do the latter than she is a paid gangster. If her job title, Secretary of State, is to foster good relations with the US then she is just as bad as the rest of them. And I think it should be clear at this point. The US and Pakistan are enemies.

  • TMH  On June 4, 2011 at 7:52 am

    Well written article, calling spade a spade. What i do not
    understand is why general is bracketing India and making
    her part of the solution? India is part and parcel of the problem.
    Both India and America colluded against us, behind our backs.
    If America have to get out of this mess of her own making,
    Then he has to dump India, like she did Pakistan, Remember?

  • Nadeem  On June 4, 2011 at 7:53 am

    A powerful rejoinder to all enemies of Pakistan, internal and external. Let there be no doubt, Pakistan will be defended at all costs.

    We need unity of our people and spine at the leadership level.


  • Amir Rana  On June 4, 2011 at 9:36 am

    I endorse 90% of what Aslam Baig suggested. It is of course another unfortunate part that rational solutions are being presented by persons who don’t have a clean past due to which the solution itself sometimes gets a hit. Imran Khan suggests same sort of way out and again he is also not a Mr. Clean. But for that matter we cannot point out even a single person presently in a position to exert considerable influence who can claim to be 100% clean. It represents the character of us as a nation which is the most unfortunate part of our current scenario. We should admit that as a whole we have become a corrupt nation lead by the toppers of this category.

    There is a serious need to play our roles, both individually and collectively to raise the moral and ethical standards of the society we live along. As far as Pak-US relationship is concerned, the only way to take it forward is to settle the regional issues amicably. Current strategy of “crushing” the uprising has never and will never bring the desired results. If crushing at the end is the thing to be done then it should be of US and NATO forces instead of our own people. I say this because agenda of US and NATO does not include any “factual” objective to resolve the issues or to bring some good to the globe. They are defenders of their own ulterior agenda of defending capitalism and to implement their concept of globalism based upon highly cruel racial concepts (superiority of white race and all the remaining humans to be their servants, rather slaves). Yes, they don’t promote it in its original form and a lot of sugar coating ahs been done around the concept of racism but this is still one of the primary forces behind all this great game of resources, power and control.

  • khan saheb  On June 5, 2011 at 4:51 am

    Abrar et al,

    I wish PK was in a position to choose. The country has already been sold to the highest bidder and we are just going through the motions and snatching whatever bits, pieces and shreds of clothing left to cover the private parts of the body. No major strategic decision can be allowed to be taken in Islamabad. Even the central bank is not run by the Govt since Syed Saleem Raza was packed up as Governor and shown the door, same time last year. Unfortunately, its a case of compulsion, not choice. We are all sensible people and can figure out the brass tacks.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: