FBI Account of “Terror Plot” Suggests Sting Operation

By Dr Gareth Porter

While the administration of Barack Obama vows to hold the Iranian government “accountable” for the alleged plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in Washington, the legal document describing evidence in the case provides multiple indications that it was mainly the result of an FBI “sting” operation.

Although the legal document, called an amended criminal complaint, implicates Iranian-American Manssor Arbabsiar and his cousin Ali Gholam Shakuri, an officer in the Iranian Quds Force, in a plan to assassinate Saudi Arabian Ambassador Adel al-Jubeir, it also suggests that the idea “originated with and was strongly pushed by a undercover DEA informant, at the direction of the FBI”.

On May 24, when Arbabsiar first met with the DEA informant he thought was part of a Mexican drug cartel, it was not to hire a hit squad to kill the ambassador. Rather, there is reason to believe that the main purpose was to arrange a deal to sell large amounts of opium from Afghanistan.

In the complaint, the closest to a semblance of evidence that Arbabsiar sought help during that first meeting to assassinate the Saudi ambassador is the allegation, attributed to the DEA informant, that Arbabsiar said he was “interested in, among other things, attacking an embassy of Saudi Arabia”.

Among the “other things” was almost certainly a deal on heroin controlled by officers in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Three Bloomberg reporters, citing a “federal law enforcement official”, wrote that Arbabsiar told the DEA informant he represented Iranians who “controlled drug smuggling and could provide tons of opium”.

Because of opium entering Iran from Afghanistan, Iranian authorities hold 85 percent of the world’s opium seizures, according to Iran’s Fars News Agency. Iranian security personnel, including those in the IRGC and its Quds Force, then have the opportunity to sell the opium to traffickers in the Middle East, Europe and now Mexico.

Mexican drug cartels have begun connecting with Middle Eastern drug traffickers, in many cases stationing operatives in Middle East locations to facilitate heroin production and sales, according to a report last January in Border Beat, an online news service run by University of Arizona journalism students.

But the FBI account of the contacts between Arbabsiar and the DEA informant does not reference any discussions of drugs.

The criminal complaint refers to an unspecified number of meetings between Arbabsiar and the DEA informant in late June and the first two weeks of July.

What transpired in those meetings remains the central mystery surrounding the case.

The official account of the investigation cites the testimony of the informant (referred to in the document as “CS-1”) in stating, “Over the course of a series of meetings, ARBABSIAR explained to CS-1 that his associates in Iran had discussed a number of violent missions for CS-1 and CIS-1’s purported criminal associates to perform.”

The account claims that the mission discussed included murdering the ambassador. But no specific statement proposing or agreeing to the act is attributed to Arbabsiar. “Prior to the July 14 meeting, CS- 1 had reported that he and Arbabsiar had discussed the possibility of attacks on a number of other targets,” the account states.

The targets are described as involving “foreign government facilities associated with Saudi Arabia and with another country…located either in or outside the United States”, without mentioning any discussion of the Saudi ambassador.

Both that language and the absence of any statement attributed to Arbabsiar imply that the Iranian- American said nothing about assassinating the Saudi ambassador except in response to suggestions by the informant, who was already part of an FBI undercover operation.

The DEA informant, as the FBI account acknowledges in a footnote, had previously been charged with a narcotics offence by a state in the U.S. and had been cooperating in narcotics investigations – apparently posing as a drug cartel operative – in return for dropping the charges. The document is notably silent on whether the conversation was recorded.

A former FBI official familiar with procedures in such cases, who spoke to IPS anonymously, said the FBI would normally have recorded all such conversations touching on the possibility of terrorism.

The absence of quotes from any of those meetings suggests that they do not support the case being made by the FBI and the Obama administration.

The account is quite explicit, on the other hand, that the Jul. 14 and Jul. 17 meetings were recorded at FBI direction. Statements quoted from those transcripts show the DEA informant trying to induce Arbabsiar to indicate agreement to assassinating the Saudi ambassador.

The informant is quoted as saying he would need “at least four guys” and would “take the one point five for the Saudi Arabia”. He declared that he “go ahead and work on the Saudi Arabia, get all the information we can”.

At one point the informant says, “You just want the, the main guy.” And at the end of the meeting, he declares, “[W]e’re gonna start doing the guy”.

The fact that not a single quote from Arbabsiar shows that he agreed to assassinating the ambassador, much less proposed it, suggests that he was either non-committal or linking the issue to something else, such as the prospect of a major drug deal with the cartel.

Arbabsiar’s quotes from a Sep. 2 phone conversation referring to the cartel as “having the number for the safe” and “once you open the door that’s it” could refer to a drug transaction that had been discussed, while the FBI account suggest those quotes refer to the assassination and “other projects” with the Iranian group.

At the Jul. 17 meeting, the DEA informant presented a plan to blow up a restaurant to kill the ambassador, with the possible deaths of 100-150 people, eliciting a lack of concern on the part of Arbabsiar about such deaths.

During a visit to Iran in August, Arbabsiar wired two equal payments totalling $100,000 to a bank account in New York. But he was still under the impression that he was about to cash in on a deal with the cartel.

The Washington Post reported Thursday that Arbabsiar had told an Iranian-American friend from Corpus Christie, Texas, “I’m going to make good money.”

There is also circumstantial evidence that Arbabsiar may have even been brought into the sting operation to help further implicate his cousin Gholam Shakuri in the terrorist plot.

Arbabsiar met with his cousin Shakuri in late September and told him that the cartel was demanding that he, Arbabsiar, go to Mexico personally to guarantee payment. That demand from the DEA was an obvious device by the FBI to get Shakuri and his associates in Tehran to demonstrate their commitment to the assassination.

The FBI account indicates that Shakuri told Arbabsiar that he was responsible for himself if he went to Mexico. That statement would have been a warning sign for Arbabsiar, if he still believed he was dealing with one of the most murderous drug cartels in Mexico, that he would be risking his own life for a group that was no longer taking responsibility for him.

Yet Arbabsiar flew to Mexico as if unconcerned about that risk.

After his arrest on Sep. 29 Arbabsiar waived the right to a lawyer and proceeded to provide a complete confession. A few days later, he placed a phone call to Shakuri which was recorded “at the direction of federal enforcement agents”, according to the FBI.

*Gareth Porter is an investigative historian and journalist specialising in U.S. national security policy. The paperback edition of his latest book, “Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam”, was published in 2006.

NOTE:This is a cross post from IPS.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • S U Turkman  On October 14, 2011 at 1:56 am

    Yes, it became a Sting Operation because one of the US Informant in Mexico, a Mexican Citizen was thought to be a member Mexican Drug Mafia Gang by that Iranian Agent of Iranian Intelligence Agency ‘QooDs’.
    The Informant did his job informing FBI. FBI did not believe him at first and thought he was lying or may have mis-understood that Iranian but it told him to go forward with the deal.
    When he made the deal and got Money, FBI arrested the ‘QooDs’ Agent because whatever the Agent had done was either recorded on Audio or Video Tape. After learning he was on Audio and Video Tapes, the Agent admitted his guilt and told FBI that he works for ‘QooDs’.
    Now go spin all this which way you people want. You can not change facts with your rhetoric and Conspiracy Theories.

  • Ali Kazim  On October 14, 2011 at 2:03 am

    Interesting. Thanks.

    Ali Kazim

  • khan saheb  On October 14, 2011 at 3:05 am

    After being part of 500+ Test matches, combined as an ace all-rounder, Australian captain, writer, commentator and sometimes, or simply sitting in the pavilion as a cricket animal, watching the happenings on the cricket field – both in the day and in the night – for over 57 years, Richie Benaud was in no mood to throw in the towel. Then came a time that he was compelled to and it wasn’t because of age or health. It was because of match-fixing. How could he possibly do a commentary or write on a game that was oxygen to him, knowing that what he is watching may have been staged. It made him sick to the stomach and he felt as if the food that he was eating was contaminated. He felt that he could not possibly be a part of this circus.

    In his autobiography My Spin on Cricket, Benaud touches on a nerve which connects not only with cricket, but just about everything that we see happening around us and being reported.

    I guess, there comes a time when the line between fact and fiction fades away and one is not really sure of what to believe or what not to.

    There are many sensible and educated people here in the US who still believe that Osama bin Laden is out there somewhere and will resurface and that most of the 19 hijackers of 9/11 are actually alive and kicking and read about themselves regularly in the media.

    The only part of the news below which surprises me is that thankfully there appears to be no reference to a Pakistani name or involvement – directly or indirectly. But as the plot thickens, the story may end up having a different ending altogether.
    Siraj Khan

  • S U Turkman  On October 14, 2011 at 5:10 am

    Yeah its true for Lunatics this kind of time comes all the time ‘when the line between fact a fiction fades and one is not really sure of what to believe and what not to’ because they live an imaginary world.
    Turkman pronounced ‘Toorkmaan’ is not a Pakistani name yet there are at least a couple of villages in Punjab, where people claim to be ‘Toorkman’. There are places named at word ‘toorkman’ not only in Pakistan but also in India. There is a whole country named Turkmenistan but who can argue with Lunatics …!.
    If this man is not talking about my last name, I have no idea, why he thinks, name of the Irani ‘QooDs’ Agent should be Pakistani. In his brain plot thickens without any reason to show for and for reasons unknown, though an Iranian, Mansoor, a rich used Car Dealer from Texas, a US Citizen sits in Jail pleading guilty. Allaho Akbar …!

  • Shaukat  On October 14, 2011 at 4:27 pm

    The guy in the video is one of the biggest “conspiracy theorists” in the US, but occasionally worth listening to. My apologies to those who may be getting some of their own back!

  • Khan Zia  On October 14, 2011 at 4:28 pm

    Thanks. If true, it can have very serious consequences for Pakistan. Chances are, it constitutes not much more than an attempt to pile up pressure on Iran in an effort to squeeze some concession or help from her in resolving issues in Afghanistan or Iraq. Things can get out of hand quickly in this game of brinkmanship. This is a risk no one can afford to take given what it might do to the world economy in its present precarious state. Unlike Musharraf and his nincompoop coterie of advisers, Iranians are made of sterner stuff. They are knowledgeable and seasoned operators with courage to stand firm when it comes to their national rights and interests. Let us hope the stand-off ends in a stalemate and goes no further. An indication of support from Pakistan at this stage will go a long way to ensure this.

  • Joseph Colinino  On October 14, 2011 at 4:32 pm

    I don’t think too many people were buying into this absurd story to begin with. What a joke. Let us pray God it doesn’t lead to WWIII however.

  • S U Turkman  On October 14, 2011 at 5:15 pm

    When have any Conspiracy Theorist bought in to any facts?
    Half of the Moslims still believe 9/11 was not caused by Al Qaeda. How stupid can they be?

  • Pervez  On October 15, 2011 at 2:10 am

    I agree with Khan Zia Sahib’s suggestion. Pakistan should immediately support Iran clearly.

    How can this group act to make this happen? An appropriate press release? Khan Sahib would you care to circulate a draft we can all sign in hard copy?

    I think it should be addressed to the Foreign Minister.

    Parvez Amin
    SB Mech E MIT ’56; FRSA
    Chairman Madadgar Pakistan

    Gulkalee, Harbanspura Road
    Cell: 0333 422 77 51

  • Faisal Imam  On October 17, 2011 at 7:23 am

    instead of fighting a war,if we allow the pipelines to go through,we should see a number of lines to the sea from Central Asia through Afghanistan to Gwadar, multan, and the East. it would bring in the prosperity to the entire region. commerce would flow and everything along with it.
    we could afford an Army much easier and give them their weaponry etc from the latest sources.
    with the gas in kohat,we could give the best life in the Fata region.
    With the motorway,we would integrate four or five Provinces of Pakistan.(northern region as the fifth.).Economic interdependance is far more important than religion base.
    Railway lines should run east-west and from Afghanistan,Central Asia to Karachi and Gwadar,Quetta. A rail link through Iran to Turkey.
    Wake Up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: