Does “The” Super Power Understand Limits of National Power?

This article is a Pakpotpourri Exclusive offered to us for exclusive running in Pakistan

By:Brig Shaukat Qadir(R)

During the Cold War era, the limits of national power between the two global powers was defined by the need to stay short of the threshold of nuclear tolerance of the other power i.e. while fighting ‘proxy wars’, never pose a threat that could escalate to a nuclear exchange which could end up destroying the world.

The disintegration of the USSR left the US as the sole super power and there seemed to be no limits to the extent to which it could exert national power. Slowly, the US began to flex its muscles and each time it went unchallenged, emboldened it further and further, till it was convinced that it could get away with anything. And in this fond belief, the US began to make the very same error made by the erstwhile USSR, which had caused its implosion; the US also began to stretch itself militarily, beyond its economic capabilities.

Now all this was not sheer idiocy; the US had expectations of economic gains. In Afghanistan; apart from Afghanistan’s store of untapped resources, the opening of a “Silk Route” from Central Asia, via Afghanistan-Pakistan would have more than made up for the expenses incurred during the war. In Iran, cheap oil could have resulted in the same.

Of course, both ventures would have only made the rich in the US richer and ordinary Americans might still have found it necessary to occupy Wall Street; but books could have been balanced. However, as they say, ‘the best laid plans…’. 

Iraq refused to extend the period of US forces on their soil and US forces left without gaining anything financially substantial for their enormous expense incurred.

In Afghanistan, the US is again facing defeat while China and India seem to be walking away with mineral rights! It was generally accepted by the US that, when it came to a negotiated settlement on Afghanistan, Pakistan could be relied upon to use its relations with the Taliban; and, of course, Pakistan was a faithful pet dog that could always be brought to heel!

But then the unbelievable began to happen. In March 2010, the US President was very politely told by Pakistan’s army chief that he would not “obey” US demands that ran contrary to Pakistani interests. The Raymond Davis fiasco was turned into a “priceless opportunity” by the Pakistan army and ISI to oust the hundreds of CIA agents operating in Pakistan.

Operation Geronimo killed Osama bin Laden and embarrassed the military/ISI but they still survived. Memogate and the massacre of 26 Pakistani soldiers, including two officers at Salala were also embarrassments but merely seemed to strengthen Pakistan’s resolve. As I wrote in an earlier article, “this dog refused to come to heel again” and, while the domestic political scene in Pakistan is fraught with uncertainty and insecurity, the US has played all its cards and lost. 

Gen Clark, on behalf of NATO has completed his investigation; a report that Pakistan has rejected. How far relations between the two countries will be restored is something time alone will tell; both countries are fully aware that relations will never again return to the pre-2011 level, nor will Pakistan facilitate talks with Afghans if they run contrary to its own interests.

Consequently, the US is looking at other options to strengthen its position by helping to open offices for Taliban in Qatar. Further, they are contemplating the release of Mullah Muhammed Fazl as a gesture of goodwill.

Mullah Fazl has been incarcerated in Guantanamo Bay for just over a decade. He was a very trusted general in Mullah Omer’s regime despite the fact that he was renowned for his cruelty. Apart from being personally responsible for the death of hundreds (some say many thousands) of Shia Hazarvis, he is accused of executing seven Iranian diplomats in Mazar-e-Sharif.

The US is under tremendous pressure to be seen as being in control. With Europe caught in its economic crisis, none of US’ European partners are prepared to commit to an open ended term in Afghanistan. President Obama, coming up for re-election will look very silly if he is deserted by NATO. Consequently, he cannot afford to let the Chicago summit meet the same fate as the Istanbul and Bonn Conferences in November/December last year; thus the urgency accelerated pace of “talking to Taliban”.

While Mullah Fazl’s release and dispatch to Qatar could turn out to be a master-stroke to bring Mullah Omer to the table, but the gamble smacks of desperation. Fazl has been absent for a decade; new centers of power have emerged among the Taliban, most noteworthy being the Haqqani Network. Will the Haqqanis accept Fazl as their superior? Can Mulla Omer risk even asking them to do so?

Meantime, Pakistan hasn’t sat idle either. While stating that Iran has legitimate interests in Afghanistan is merely stating the obvious, but Pakistan has spent so long in the US’ pocket that the foreign office spokesman, Abdul Basit’s statement, “Establishing sustainable security and stability in Afghanistan is impossible without Iran’s role. To establish security and reinvigorate Afghanistan, Iran must be given due attention and must be trusted, because pushing the trend of peace and establishing durable security and stability without Iran’s partnership is impossible” was a very refreshing change.

A clarion warning, not only to US/NATO but also to the Taliban seeking Pakistani support; this statement made it clear that Afghanistan too has to live with its neighbors.

Fazl’s return is viewed uneasily, not only in Tehran, but also in Moscow and Central Asia. Fazl used to be responsible for the province of Kunduz and assisted all Islamist movements in Central Asia.

Nor has Moscow been inactive. Since it began its modest economic recovery in 2004/5, it has been mending fences with China, to their mutual benefit and, with Chinese approval; it has begun to re-exert its influence in Central Asia. Not only do we now have the SCO, but Russia has also created the Collective Security Treaty Organization, CSTO. Its members include:  Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.

December last year, CSTO came up with an astonishing resolution which said, “The most important outcome of our meeting was an agreement on the coordination of military infrastructure deployment by non-members of CSTO on the territory of CSTO member states. Now, in order to deploy a military base of a third country on the territory of a CSTO member state, it will be necessary to obtain official approval of all CSTO member states. I think this is a clear sign of the organization’s unity and its members’ utmost loyalty to allied relations.”

Thus, in one fell blow putting to rest US’ and Indian aspirations of military bases in the region.

Commenting on this, former Indian diplomat, M K Bhadrakumar notes that: 

“The last sentence was dripping with irony since the Obama administration had just recently taken a decision to provide military assistance to Uzbekistan in a policy turnaround with the intent to hijack the key Central Asian country to undermine the CSTO. To Washington’s dismay, Uzbek President Islam Karimov not only attended the CSTO summit in Moscow, but went on to voice his support of the alliance’s decision.

With this, Moscow signaled to Washington that its monopoly of conflict-resolution in Afghanistan has to end. The US has a choice to crawl back into Pakistan’s favor and persuade Islamabad to reopen the transit routes that have been shut down for a month already or, alternatively, fall back on the Northern Distribution Network for supplying NATO troops and for taking the men and materials out as the troop drawdown picks momentum through 2011.

The CSTO decision hangs like a sword of Damocles on the US base in Manas near Bishkek, the capital of Kyrgyzstan, which is a strategic hub for air transportation.”  

And let’s not forget that apart from the expense and difficulties being faced by US/NATO by being forced to rely exclusively on the “Northern Route”, due to which NATO spokesman admits that “we have supplies for only a few months”; Russia has also put the use of that supply route under threat by linking it to US’ decision to deploy the strategic nuclear defense shield in Europe.

While there are no indications that Russia and Pakistan are acting in unison, it is obvious that Russia also wants to mend fences with Pakistan, having lost India to the US. With Russu-Chinese cooperation on the one hand, the strengthened CSTO on the other; coupled with Pakistan playing its cards cleverly, balancing Iran and the Taliban, the US options in Afghanistan seem to have become increasingly limited and, as Bhadrakumar also notes, Pakistan’s role resumes its critical importance.

And so, the New Great Game, NGG, with the resources of Central Asia and Afghanistan, and containment of US vs Russia, China, and Iran goes on; but not without counter moves by emerging and re-emerging centers of power, along with the relatively insignificant countries like Pakistan.

China has followed the Russian example of announcing itself ready for another World War. Iran is threatening US’ oil supplies in the Straits of Hormuz.

It seems that intentionally or unintentionally, international compulsions and maneuvers are driving home to the US that its powers are not unlimited. A difficult lesson for the (still) sole super power to learn; but the sooner it learns it, the better off the world will be.      

The writer is a retired brigadier from the armed forces of Pakistan & a known political commentator based in Rawalpindi.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • S U Turkman  On January 10, 2012 at 9:43 pm

    As usual, a 16th Century Brain trying to tell us, what he thinks about 21st Century Politics of this world like a 16th Century Dead talking out of his Grave without knowledge of how we live now.
    Go back to sleep in your 16th Century world Brain Dead Brigadier or it may start hurting your Brain …!

    • parvezamin  On January 11, 2012 at 2:29 am

      Calling some one ‘brain dead’ does not make him brain dead. It simply displays your dislike for his proposal. The analysis by Brig. Qadir makes sense for Pakistan. No one has forced the US to establish a presence in this area. If it does not like the way the region is organizing itself, all it has to do is to withdraw.

      • S U Turkman  On January 11, 2012 at 2:51 am

        Pakistan has forced USA to land in Afghanistan because it was Pakistan that …
        * … had kept interfering in to Politics of Afghanistan after Soviets left and USA had stopped sending Charity of Aid and Weapons to Pakistan.
        * … had impose its biggest Agent Hekmatyar over Afghans.
        * … had started recruiting Taliban after Hekmatyar was going down the Drain.
        * … had trained and armed Taliban.
        * … had infiltrated 2 Division of Pak Army disguised as Taliban with Taliban in to Afghanistan and had kept her Army their to help Taliban for 5 years.
        * … had requested Osama to settle in Afghanistan.
        * … had distributed 8 feet tall color Posters of Osama in Moslim Countries and had pasted on Walls in Pakistan to make him become famous.
        * … had accommodated Arabs without any Visa in to Pakistan and Afghanistan.
        * … had its ISI Chief send $ 100,000 to 9/11 Hijaker Leader Mohammad Ata in USA.
        USA has no intention to stay in Moslim Countries. USA has left Iraq as USA had promised and Obama has announced that US Army would be leaving Afghanistan in 2014. Its Expansionist Pak Army that wants its presence in Afghanistan through Taliban, not USA. Its China that has signed two deals with karzai that wants her presence in Afghanistan before Pakistan Military can steal anything from Afghans.

  • parvezamin  On January 11, 2012 at 2:23 am

    It seems to me that Pakistan should join the Collective Security Treaty Organization. This would be in the collective interest and would define the region that can pool its resources for mutual development , mutual defence and create a ‘No War’ zone. Once this is in place, collective development can start in earnest. The US would be accepted as a country CSTO trades with.

    • S U Turkman  On January 11, 2012 at 3:00 am

      India had offered Pakistan ‘No 1st Nuke Use’ Treaty and that offer is still open as India had unilaterally announced after Pakistan had rejected the offer that India would never be the first to use Nukes against Pakistan.
      If Pakistan is a peace loving country, why she keeps refusing to sign that treaty?
      Pak Military does not want to sign any such treaty because Atomic Bombs and Missiles have been built to blackmail the world and avoid another 1971, while Pak Military keeps treating people in remaining Pakistan just like before. Latest example? Balochis.
      LaanaTollah …!
      Kaafir Pak Military has killed dozens of time more Moslims in Pakistan and Afghanistan than Indian Military has in India since 1947.
      Pakistan ZinDaabaaD …! Pakistan sai ZinDaa Bhaag …!

      • parvezamin  On January 11, 2012 at 7:04 am

        Well and clearly said. People can weigh up our diverging opinions and act according to their choice.

        If Pakistan is not signing the treaty with India immediately, it only means that enough confidence has not been built up on the Pakistan side. In due course, this will happen and both will live in peace. Until then, let us be nice to each other and wait for positive feelings to take birth. Its one planet and we all have to learn to live with each other.

      • a m malik  On January 11, 2012 at 7:06 am

        Turkey Idiot
        US is so stupid to get trapped to whatever Pakistan says? And Pakistan was also responsible mighty of the US then withdraw for goading US to go in for Iraq and to Libya and Algeria?? It was not the oil and firms belonging to HI and mighty of US getting the oil deals struck at attractive rates??
        And then open the leash of your likes to demonize target countries – includes Zameer Froashs people like u?
        Your rhetoric and assumptions are bordering to plain absurdity and are devoid of facts. But Pakistan dushman as you are you will continue to slander Pakistan and the Army to ur heart content.
        Viz India and the nukes – I would be an idiot(as u ) If I pledge no first strike capability. We did not make nukes to wear them in place of ear rings or place it lower down. By the way has Israel pledged no first strike capability or US for that matter despite over whelming strength in conventional warfare??

  • TMH  On January 11, 2012 at 8:08 am

    In the light of this article, if Pakistan is to keep on playing his cards right, we will be
    home free from all of our worries. However, we have to worry about the US foisted government,
    which is like a bad dream. This time we must see to it that this mafia is gone for ever, InshaAllah.


  • khan saheb  On January 11, 2012 at 3:43 pm

    This may be all very well. What make the outcome uncertain are doubts about Pakistan’s commitment to remain firm in her resolve. It is not simply the pressure from the US. We don’t know if the latter has not induced China to help her out. It is a defining moment for us. Any weakness now will spell disaster. It will prolong the war and destroy what is left of the economy. The war has to end at the earliest. For what it is worth, the only way we can be certain is if and when there is a meaningful change in the set-up in Islamabad. Until that happens everything is up in the air.

    • S U Turkman  On January 11, 2012 at 7:34 pm

      Khan Saheb,
      Its up to Pak Military to end its war against USA through Taliban. USA is not fighting Pakistan. Lying, cheating, back-stabbing Beggar Pak Military is, for the last 10 years.
      USA had not said anything how to run your country. It was Pakistan that had gone to USA begging for Charity. If you are so sure that you do not need any Charity, go ahead and order US Ambassador out …!
      I guess, you do not know, how Afghans were starving to death under rule of your Military and its Mercenaries in Afghanistan. Go ahead, let tens of millions of Pakistanis die because you crazy Nuts are Pakistan, not Pakistanis.

  • Arif Khan  On January 15, 2012 at 1:16 am

    Excellent Well written!! Arif

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: